Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

Attendees

 

Dennis Wisnosky

 

Decisions

Should any of this stuff be coved back into BE? Our thought is no, as these are talking specifically about financial intermediaries.  If there are concepts which are not financial industry specific, e.g. Co­operative, then these should be moved to BE. Similarly perhaps there are kinds of mutual organizations e.g. thrift companies (US), these would be BE, but as soon as a concept exists only because of financial regulation, it goes in FBC.

Also we need to focus on the axioms ­ it may well be that thrifts and co­ops are the same thing, or subtly distinct sub­classes of a generic thing which is an entity owned by its members for example.  Needs research.

Proceedings

Action items

  • No labels