Date

18 Feb 2020

Attendees

Agenda

1) Use Case reminder

2) Where we are on our road map.

3) Open Action Items

4) JIRA Issues Review - https://jira.edmcouncil.org/projects/DER/issues/DER-10?filter=allopenissues

5) Todays content discussion.

6) For next week.

Proceedings:

Today we reviewed the example from the Mizuho sample data that Elisa has been working on. We noted that although there are gaps, some decent progress has been made. Some questions regarding how to ensure that each leg of a swap is unique and disjoint came up, i.e., that perhaps we could insert disjointness to ensure that has paying leg is disjoint from has receiving leg. One way to do that would be to create property chains / queries for hasLeg → hasContractParty → hasIdentity → isIdentifiedBy → LEI, and ensure that the LEIs are unique. That may require SPARQL, rather than actual property chains in OWL.

Next steps with respect to the example include: (1) working out what is causing a logical inconsistency with what we have already modeled and remedying that, (2) add missing elements, and (3) generation of the FpML rates so that we can reference the benchmarks. Pete is working on (3), and Elisa will continue working on (1) and (2) between now and our next meeting.

We also discussed turning the example into a static demo available in the wiki and possibly on the web site, with step by step instructions for FIBO users to use so that they can recreate the demo locally for themselves. That may require more time / investment, but would be quite useful if we can make that happen. We will at least link some of the results into the use case so that people can see what we did in the near term, once we have the sample data modeled.

Decisions:

Action items