Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

The following table identifies ontologies to be reviewed for proper and consistent use of values.

Value Class or  property

 

Change

 

Hits

 

Reason

 

Business Facing Types

 

Deprecate
  – review current usage

156 / 15

 

Not well  supported by OWL, insufficient net value

fibo-fnd-arr-id;Identifier

 

fibo-fnd-arr-id;TextIdentifier (Subclass of AtomicValue)

 

22/16


 

Current  IDs assume a text property, create this class to capture that assumption.

 

fibo-fnd-arr-id;Identifier 

Subclass  of Value

 

 

Allows  for non-text ID. Issue:FND-91

 

fibo-fnd-dt-bd

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values


 

27/2


 
 

fibo-fnd-dt-fd

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

456 / 61 


 

fibo-fnd-plc-adr;Address 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values 

10/5 

 

fibo-fnd-qt-qtu;hasNumericValue 

Subproperty  of hasValue or rename to hasValue


 

7/5

 

Choice

 

fibo-fnd-qt-qtu;QuantityValue 

Subclass  of AtomicValue

 

18/5+


 
 

fibo-fnd-rel-rel;hasUniqueIdentifier

 

Subproperty  of hasValue


 

8/5

 

Note Used in  individuals 

Choice:  Just rename to hasValue?


 

xmlns:fibo-fnd-math-math

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

287 / 22


 
 

fibo-md-temx-tem 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

56 / 14

 
 

Other Choices


·        To fold “Value” and “AtomicValue” into one class with an optional “hasValue” property.


·        Further review of ontologies using BFT


  • No labels