...
Ontologies Considered for Reuse
Ontology IRI | Ontology Description | Ontology Serialisation | Reuse Promoter | Reuse Pros | Reuse Cons | Reuse Decision | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chemistry and Biology Ontologies | |||||||
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/chebi.owl | CHEBI - Chemical Entities of Biological Interest | ttl |
| Just follow pattern(s):
| THIS IS JUST A TEST/EXAMPLE RECOMMENDATION | ||
Infrastructure and Metadata Ontologies | |||||||
https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/ | DCAT - Data Catalog Vocabulary The main item is DCAT - it's the W3C ontology for data catalogues, and we are close to a release of version 3. This is a key component of several pieces of work on the development of FAIR data, including all of the EU Member States' efforts in open data, industrial data spaces, and also catalogues of services etc. It is also core to the DDI-CDI work that CODATA and the EOSC are involved in as part of CODATA's decadal programme of work. Basically, it goes a long way to provide the "F". | Email from Pedro <pedro.win.stan@googlemail.com> to Gerhard Noelken. | |||||
https://www.omg.org/spec/COMMONS/ | Commons Ontology Library | .rdf, .ttl | Elisa Kendall |
| Published recently | Full reuse | |
Citation Ontologies | |||||||
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2903725/ (CiTo) | CiTO, the Citation Typing Ontology | ? |
|
| Do not reuse | ||
http://bibliontology.com/ (BIBO) | Bibliographic Ontology Specification | .rdf |
|
| Do not reuse | ||
https://sparontologies.github.io/fabio/current/fabio.html (FRBR) | FaBiO, the FRBR-aligned Bibliographic Ontology | .rdf, .ttl, JSON-LD, NT |
|
|
| See also https://www.ifla.org/current-ifla-standards/ | |
https://sparontologies.github.io/frbr/current/frbr.html | Essential FRBR in OWL2 DL | .rdf |
|
|
|
Reuse Types
Reuse Decision | Comment |
---|---|
Do not reuse | |
Just follow pattern(s) | |
Partial reuse | E.g., we use a single resource without importing the whole ontology |
Full reuse owl:imports |