| # | Res | Ontology | Element | Note | JIRA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S | ||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | |||||
| 8 | |||||
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 17 | |||||
| 18 |
Notes:
1) Needs resolution: isLegallyDefinedIn. Currently the object property resides in LegalPersons and has a range of GeopoliticalEntity. We recommend that the range should instead by Jurisdiction. Furthermore, we need to link a jurisdiction to a kind of Polity perhaps via the LegalSystem. We may consider introduce a new relation between Polity and the LegalSystem it authorizes.
2) We have decided not to model property chain axioms that produce inferences (for example isOrganizedIn o hasReach subClassOf isDomiciledIn). However we will use property chains to model definitions of concepts (for example isEstablishedBy o isInForceIn o hasReach subClassOf isLegallyDefinedIn expresses the meaning of isLegallyDefinedIn).